Right wing pundits have begun their “CUPE Watch” claiming that the union wants only to disrupt the system in 2010.
Thanks for the shout out, Dan! You raise a lot of interesting points, and I will post a full response when work calms down a bit.
But for now, I'd like to ask you this: you're clearly a senior CUPE executive, so why did you identify yourself in the article as an "activist with CUPE"? Isn't that misleading? And isn't that futher evidence that the 2010 project is primarily driven by CUPE executives, and not by the rank-and-file?